Tagsaffects Althusser ambient poetics analytic moral philosophy Aristotle Badiou bichat bioethics books brian leiter children conference consent continental vs. analytic deleuze Deleuze and Guattari democracy Derrida Dewey dispositions education ethical puzzle Ethics event friendship Graham Harman habit harman Higher Education humanities crisis James jane bennett Job Market kant Larval Subjects Latour Leiter Levi Bryant Levinas Lingis love Malabou materialism Mead Merleau-Ponty metaphysics method methodology middlesex Morton music nietzsche Noe object-oriented philosophy objects personhood Phenomenology piracy pirates Plato police violence power profiles Publishing relations Republic Sensation Simon Blackburn skepticism speculative realism spinoza teaching vibrant matter whitehead writing
- Follow Plastic Bodies on WordPress.com
Category Archives: Phenomenology
Right now I’m halfway through Alva Noe’s Action in Perception. I won’t say much about it, mostly because I think a lot of the conclusions he draws are very close to Merleau-Ponty. That is, if you’ve read MP thoroughly, a … Continue reading
Thomas’s comment on my previous post got me thinking about how phenomenology is often cast as a school of thought or a ‘movement’. The same thing can be said about pragmatism, and in many ways (although this may ring as … Continue reading
Numerous folks have noted the parallels between phenomenology and pragmatism. This raises the question: What does phenomenology give us that pragmatism cannot? Someone must have answered this question, so I guess I’ll have to track that answer down. If you … Continue reading
Thinking about method, I’m inclined to say there are three dominant approaches to figuring things out. You can proceed deductively, of course, as Descartes and Spinoza. You can proceed inductively like the empiricists. Or you can proceed adductively, which is … Continue reading
This summer I’ll be writing a brief book that will probably be called Against Phenomenology. The title is meant to be provocative, but it is not a wholesale rejection of phenomenology by any means. Instead, by looking at representative passages … Continue reading
The question is Peirce’s, from his “The Principles of Phenomenology.” His answer is one I endorse, but I would quibble with him about it is one born out of phenomenology. Against those who would have qualities depend upon the mind … Continue reading
Several years ago we caught wind of a new translation of Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception, which was undertaken by Sean Kelly. He was blogging about the experience here until the blog went defunct. If I remember correctly, there were some … Continue reading
Can anyone recommend some texts that argue that Heidegger was not a phenomenologist? The claim that he basically takes nothing, or very little, from Husserl and thus is not a Husserlian phenomenologist is common enough. But I’m more interested in … Continue reading
Here’s a simple question: If someone were to write that there is ‘inherent meaning’ in nature, what would that mean to you?
Morton does make a direct application of ambient poetics to phenomenological prose later on in the second chapter of EwN, specifically the writing of David Abram.